Case Results

 

  • Superior Court of California, City of Los Angeles (Case Number: SA104984)

Outcome: Case Dismissed
Case Overview: Our client initially faced a serious charge of attempted murder (PC 664-187(A)), rooted in their assertion of self-defense. However, during a critical preliminary hearing, the presiding Judge acknowledged the self-defense aspect but expressed concerns regarding the level of force employed.     
 Attempted Voluntary Manslaughter Charge (PC 664-192(A)):
Consequently, the charge was modified to attempted voluntary manslaughter (PC 664-192(A)), accompanied by a “gun enhancement” charge filed by the District Attorney’s Office, which had the potential to extend our client’s prison sentence. 
Case Dismissed by District Attorney: After relentless efforts, the District Attorney came to the crucial realization that our client had indeed acted in self-defense within their rights. As a result, the case was unequivocally dismissed, marking a remarkable success in our pursuit of justice.

Motion:
Attorney Hashemi initiated a PC 995 motion at the trial court, a strategic legal move that led to intense oral arguments and heightened anticipation.      Validating Reasonable Self-Defense:
In a significant moment marked by legal acumen, the trial judge acknowledged the reasonableness of our client’s self-defense actions. This pivotal realization resulted in the case’s dismissal, ensuring a just resolution.

 

  • Superior Court of California, City of Riverside (Case Number: RIF2104516)

Outcome: Case Dismissed
Case Overview: In a challenging legal battle, our client faced a formidable array of charges, including Robbery (PC 211), Assault with a Gun (PC 245(a)), Extortion (PC 524), Criminal Threats/GBI (PC 422), and multiple Enhancements, collectively carrying a maximum exposure of over 15 years in prison.
Validating the Right to Self-Defense: This case unfolded as a year-long, painstaking investigation by Attorney Hashemi, primarily focused on the principle of self-defense.
Case Dismissed by District Attorney: After relentless efforts, the District Attorney came to the crucial realization that our client had indeed acted in self-defense within their rights. As a result, the case was unequivocally dismissed.

  • Superior Court of California, City of Los Angeles (Case Number: BA336382)

Outcome: Case Dismissed
Case Overview: In this legal proceeding, our client faced a daunting charge, alleged violation of Section 243(d) of the California Penal Code, specifically Felony Battery with Serious Bodily Injury, carrying a maximum sentence of four years in State Prison. The turning point occurred during a pivotal preliminary hearing.
Charge Dismissed: During the preliminary hearing, the Court carefully examined the circumstances and determined that the defendant had acted in self-defense or defense of another. This pivotal decision led to the dismissal of the charge, a testament to our unwavering dedication to securing justice for our clients.

  •  Superior Court of California, City of East L.A. (Case Number: 8ES04915)

Outcome: Case Dismissed
Case Overview: Our client faced a challenging legal situation, with charges including one count of Battery (PC 242) and one count of Indecent Exposure (PC 314(1)).
Jury Finds Client Not Guilty: Through meticulous trial preparation and compelling legal advocacy, our client’s case proceeded to trial. In a resounding verdict, the Jury delivered a unanimous Not Guilty verdict on both counts, resulting in our client’s acquittal.

  • Superior Court of California, City of Los Angeles (Case Number: SA096281-01)

Outcome: Case Dismissed
Case Overview: The defendant in this case was confronted with a significant charge, one count of Second Degree Robbery (PC 211), which carried a potential sentence of 5 years in State Prison.
Judge Agrees, Case Dismissed: During a pivotal Preliminary Hearing, the Judge closely examined the evidence presented. In a pivotal moment for the defense, the Judge concurred with our argument, ultimately resulting in the dismissal of the case.

  • Superior Court of California, City of Los Angeles (Case Number: SA095515)

Outcome: Case Dismissed
Case Overview: Our client confronted a daunting legal situation, charged with 2 counts of Felony Assault with a Deadly Weapon (PC 245(a)(1)). The potential consequences were significant, with a possible sentence of 16 years in State Prison. Attorney Hashemi embarked on a thorough examination of the evidence and engaged in extensive negotiations with the District Attorney.
Case Dismissed: After diligent negotiations and a meticulous review of the evidence, the case reached a pivotal turning point. The District Attorney agreed with our arguments, leading to the dismissal of the case.

  • Superior Court of California, City of Burbank

Outcome: Case Dismissed
Case Overview: The defendant in this case faced a potentially severe penalty, with up to four years in State Prison looming due to a violation of Health & Safety Code Section 11360(a) – Transportation of Marijuana. A pivotal Preliminary Hearing brought about a significant change in the trajectory of the case.
Charge Reduced to Misdemeanor: Following the Preliminary Hearing, the Court made a crucial decision. The original charge was reduced to a misdemeanor, specifically possession (H&S 11357(c)). Furthermore, the Court allowed for the case to be dismissed upon the completion of a court-ordered drug program.

  •  Superior Court of California, City of Los Angeles (Case Number: BA474521)

Outcome: Sentenced to a Much Lower Term
Case Overview: Our client faced a daunting Murder charge (PC 187(a)), carrying a potential 25 years to Life prison sentence. A comprehensive investigation centered on self-defense, along with numerous court hearings, paved the way for a significant development in the case.
Murder Charge Dismissed – Voluntary Manslaughter Plea: Following extensive efforts, the District Attorney agreed to a pivotal decision. The Murder charge was dismissed, and our client was allowed to plead to a Voluntary Manslaughter charge (PC 192(a)). This resulted in a substantially reduced prison sentence of only 6 years, based on an imperfect self-defense.
Justice Served: A Much-Lower Term Imposed

  • Superior Court of California, City of Pasadena (Case Number: GA072058-2)

Outcome: Sentenced to a Much Lower Term
Case Overview: Our client, alongside three others, faced a dire situation with charges including Attempted Murder (PC 663/187(a)), Assault With A Firearm (PC §245(a)(2)), Accessory After The Fact (§32), along with numerous Gang Enhancements (PC § 186.22(1)(c)). The potential sentence was 25 years to Life in State Prison. After an extensive year and a half of investigation, substantial evidence was gathered to establish that the defendant was not directly involved.
A Remarkable Outcome: Sentence Reduced to Six Years

  •  Superior Court of California, City of Long Beach

Outcome: No State Prison – Probation Only
Case Overview: The defendant faced allegations of violating §288(a) of the California Penal Code (Lewd or Lascivious Acts), carrying a potential sentence of up to eight years in State Prison. Following a thorough investigation and negotiations with the District Attorney, the Court rendered a sentence of Probation only.
An Outcome of Leniency: Probation Granted

  •  Superior Court of California, City of Los Angeles

Outcome: No State Prison – Probation Only
Case Overview: Charged with a violation of §11359(a) of the Health & Safety Code (Felony Possession of Marijuana for Sale), the defendant faced a potential 3-year State Prison sentence. The Court made a significant decision to sentence the defendant to 3 years’ probation. After a year and a half, the Court allowed the defendant to withdraw the guilty plea, plea to another related offense, and subsequently reduced the felony to a misdemeanor, ultimately expunging the case.
Resolution: Felony Reduced to Misdemeanor, Case Expunged

  •  Superior Court of California, City of Joshua Tree

Outcome: Plead to Lesser Charge
Case Overview: Facing 3 counts of violating the California Vehicle Code, including Driving Under the Influence of Alcohol or Drugs (§23152(a)), Driving While Having a 0.08% or Higher Blood Alcohol (§23152(b)), and Possession of Marijuana While Driving (§23222(b)), the defendant engaged in a lengthy negotiation process. Ultimately, the defendant was allowed to plead to a lesser count of “Wet Reckless” (§23103.5).

  •  Superior Court of California, City of Los Angeles

Outcome: Case Dismissed
Case Overview: The defendant faced a Misdemeanor Theft charge, a violation of §484(A) of the California Penal Code. Following extensive discussions with the District Attorney, the case was dismissed.

*Every case is different and the outcome of each legal case depends on various factors, including the facts of the case. No attorney can guarantee a positive result in any particular case. Nothing on this site constitutes a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

To schedule a consultation about your criminal or self-defense case, please contact us at (310) 448-1529 or contact us online. Our office is conveniently located in the Westside Towers in Los Angeles, within minutes of Santa Monica, Beverly Hills, Westwood, and steps away from the Expo/Bundy Station. We have flexible hours and weekend appointments, and we will visit you in jail to discuss your case.

How Would You Like Us To Contact You?(required)