LAPD’s Labrada: Assessing the Stalking Allegations

Alfred Labrada, a seasoned officer with the Los Angeles Police Department and a 30-year veteran, has been put on leave following allegations of stalking. Assistant Chief of the Los Angeles Police Department, Labrada faces claims that he stalked a female colleague by planting an Apple AirTag tracking device in her luggage. These allegations have led to significant changes at the top of the department, with the LAPD’s decision to place Labrada on leave and consider potential termination underscoring the gravity of the situation.

California’s Stance on Stalking:

California’s Penal Code Section 646.9 defines stalking. It occurs when someone intentionally and maliciously harasses another, posing a credible threat. This threat aims to make the person fear for their safety or their family’s safety. The code elaborates:

• Harassment: It means taking deliberate actions that seriously upset, annoy, or scare a specific person without a valid reason. Using tracking devices, such as Apple’s AirTag, to monitor someone’s movements can be considered a form of harassment, especially if done without the person’s knowledge or consent.
• Course of Conduct: It refers to two or more actions over a short time, showing ongoing intent. This definition excludes actions protected by the Constitution.
• Credible Threat: It can be a spoken, written, or electronic threat. The goal is to make the person fear for their or their family’s safety. In the context of the AirTag, the act of tracking someone covertly can be seen as a credible threat to their safety, even if no explicit threat was made. Proving the intent to act on the threat isn’t necessary.

Breaking this code can result in jail time, fines, or both. If the accused has an active restraining order against them, penalties can increase.

What This Means for Labrada and the LAPD:

Although details of Labrada’s alleged actions remain hidden, the LAPD’s decision shows they take these allegations seriously. The department remains committed to upholding the law, no matter the officer’s rank or experience.

Possible Legal Defenses:

Labrada’s defense team has a tough road ahead. They might consider defenses such as:

• Mistaken Identity: Labrada’s high position could make him a target for false claims.
• No Credible Threat: The defense could argue Labrada’s actions didn’t pose a real threat.
• Insufficient Evidence: They might claim there isn’t enough proof to back the stalking allegations.

Conclusion:

LAPD Assistant Chief Alfred Labrada faces allegations of stalking and harassment. These claims highlight the need for an experienced criminal defense attorney, especially for high-profile figures.

Stalking cases, like Labrada’s involving an Apple AirTag, present unique challenges. The Law Offices Of Arash Hashemi specializes in such cases, ensuring thorough defense. If facing similar allegations, contact us at (310) 870-2400 for expert counsel. Our LA office is near Santa Monica, Beverly Hills, and Westwood.