How to Fight Premeditated Murder Charges in California

Facing murder charges in California is one of the most serious legal situations a person can experience, and the distinction between premeditated murder and other forms of homicide plays a critical role in determining the penalties. Under California law, premeditation separates first-degree murder from lesser charges like second-degree murder or manslaughter. A conviction for premeditated murder can result in severe consequences, including life imprisonment or even the death penalty in certain cases.

If you or someone you love is facing allegations of premeditated murder, it is essential to understand how courts define and evaluate premeditation. With the help of an experienced Los Angeles murder defense attorney, you can challenge the prosecution’s claims and work toward the best possible outcome.

At The Law Offices of Arash Hashemi, we have over 20 years of experience defending clients against serious charges, including premeditated murder. Contact us at (310) 448-1529 to schedule a free consultation and begin building a strong defense.

---

What Is Premeditation Under California Law?

Premeditation under California law refers to the act of deliberately planning or considering a murder before carrying it out. It does not require extensive preparation or prolonged reflection—courts recognize that premeditation can occur in mere seconds, so long as the decision to kill was made intentionally and with forethought.

The key distinction lies in the defendant’s mental state at the time of the killing. A premeditated act demonstrates thoughtful and deliberate intent, whereas an impulsive or reckless act may qualify as second-degree murder or manslaughter instead.

Elements of Premeditation

To prove premeditation, the prosecution must establish three critical elements:

1. Intent to Kill
   The defendant must have formed the intent to kill before committing the act. For example:
   • Shooting a firearm with the purpose of ending the victim’s life demonstrates intent.
2. Deliberation
   Deliberation involves carefully weighing the decision to kill, even if the reflection lasts only seconds. This separates premeditated murders from those committed in the heat of passion or during reckless acts.
3. Planning
   Evidence of planning—such as purchasing a weapon, researching the victim’s schedule, or luring the victim to a specific location—can strongly support a finding of premeditation.

---

How Do Courts Determine Premeditation?

Courts often rely on what are known as the Anderson factors, established by the California Supreme Court in People v. Anderson (1968), to determine whether a murder was premeditated. These factors include:

Planning Activity

The court will evaluate whether the defendant engaged in behavior that suggests preparation for the murder. Examples of planning activity include:

• Acquiring or preparing a weapon.
• Ambushing the victim or waiting for the victim to arrive at a specific location.
• Traveling to the crime scene with murder in mind.

Motive

Motive refers to the reason behind the killing. Courts will assess whether the defendant had a clear motive, such as:

• Financial gain,
• Revenge,
• Jealousy, or
• Eliminating a threat.

A motive provides context for why the defendant may have acted with forethought.

Manner of Killing

The method used to carry out the killing can also demonstrate premeditation. A calculated or methodical manner of killing often indicates deliberate intent. Examples include:

• Multiple gunshots aimed at vital organs.
• A controlled and prolonged act, such as strangulation.
• Inflicting injuries that clearly demonstrate an intent to kill.

It’s important to note that courts do not require all three Anderson factors to convict someone of premeditated murder. Strong evidence in one or more areas can be sufficient.

---

Examples of Premeditation

Example 1: Planned Revenge

A man discovers that his coworker has been spreading false rumors about him at work. After weeks of harboring resentment, the man purchases a knife, waits for the coworker outside the office, and fatally stabs him. The preparation and motive clearly demonstrate premeditation.

Example 2: Split-Second Decision

During an argument, a woman retrieves a gun from another room and fatally shoots her partner. Even though the decision was made quickly, the brief pause to retrieve the weapon and return to the scene may satisfy the legal definition of premeditation.

---

Penalties for Premeditated Murder in California

Premeditated murder is charged as first-degree murder under California Penal Code 187 PC. If convicted, penalties may include:

25 Years to Life in Prison
A conviction for first-degree murder carries a sentence of 25 years to life in state prison.

Life Without the Possibility of Parole (LWOP)
In cases involving special circumstances—such as murder for financial gain, multiple murders, or killing a law enforcement officer—the defendant may face life without the possibility of parole.

The Death Penalty
Though rare, prosecutors may seek the death penalty in capital murder cases. However, California currently has a moratorium on executions.

---

Defenses to Premeditation in California Murder Cases

An experienced murder defense attorney can guide you on how to fight premeditated murder charges in California, leveraging defenses such as lack of intent, heat of passion, or insufficient evidence of premeditation.

Lack of Intent to Kill

Premeditation requires proof that the defendant intended to kill the victim. If the prosecution cannot establish intent, the charges may be reduced to manslaughter or dismissed entirely. Common examples include:

• Accidental Death: If the victim’s death was the result of an unintended or negligent act (e.g., an argument that led to an accidental shooting), the prosecution’s case for premeditation may fail.
• Reckless Conduct: Acting recklessly or negligently, such as during a car accident or physical altercation, does not satisfy the element of intent required for premeditation.

---

Heat of Passion

The heat of passion defense argues that the killing occurred in response to provocation or extreme emotional disturbance, leaving the defendant without the capacity to reflect or plan. To succeed with this defense, the defendant must show:

• Provocation: The victim’s actions provoked the defendant into acting impulsively. For example, discovering a spouse in the act of infidelity.
• No Time for Reflection: The defendant acted immediately, without time to deliberate or plan the act. This defense can reduce a first-degree murder charge to voluntary manslaughter, which carries a significantly lighter penalty.

---

Insufficient Evidence of Premeditation

Premeditation requires evidence of deliberate planning, motive, or intent. A strong defense can focus on highlighting weaknesses in the prosecution’s case, such as:

• No Evidence of Planning: If the prosecution cannot prove that the defendant prepared for the act (e.g., purchasing a weapon or lying in wait), it becomes harder to establish premeditation.
• No Clear Motive: If there is no clear reason why the defendant would plan the killing, this undermines the prosecution’s case for deliberate intent.
• Spontaneous Acts: The defense can argue that the killing was a spontaneous reaction, not a premeditated or deliberate act.

---

Self-Defense or Defense of Others

If the defendant acted to protect themselves or another person from immediate and serious harm, this can negate the element of intent or premeditation. For this defense to apply, the defendant must show:

• They reasonably believed they or someone else was in imminent danger of being killed or seriously harmed.
• The level of force used was proportionate to the threat. This defense can result in a full acquittal or dismissal of the charges if the evidence supports the defendant’s claim of self-defense.

---

Mental Impairment or Diminished Capacity

Mental health issues or intoxication may impair a defendant’s ability to form the intent or deliberate planning required for premeditation. Examples include:

• Mental Illness: If the defendant was suffering from a diagnosed mental health condition that affected their ability to think rationally, this could negate premeditation.
• Intoxication: If the defendant was under the influence of drugs or alcohol at the time of the act, this could challenge their ability to premeditate or act with intent. While these defenses may not absolve the defendant of guilt entirely, they could lead to reduced charges, such as second-degree murder or manslaughter.

---

Mistaken Identity

In some cases, mistaken identity may be the root of the accusations. If the defendant was not present at the scene of the crime or if their involvement has been misrepresented, this defense can apply. Common strategies to prove mistaken identity include:

• Alibi Witnesses: Testimony from individuals who can confirm the defendant’s location at the time of the crime.
• Surveillance Footage: Video evidence proving the defendant was not involved.
• Forensic Evidence: DNA or other physical evidence excluding the defendant as the perpetrator.

---

Lack of Motive

A motive provides context for why a defendant might act with premeditation. If the prosecution cannot present a plausible motive, it weakens their case. For example:

• The defendant had no prior relationship or conflict with the victim.
• There is no evidence suggesting financial gain, revenge, or other motives.

---

Constitutional Violations

If law enforcement violated the defendant’s constitutional rights during the investigation, it may result in evidence being excluded or the charges being dismissed. Common violations include:

• Illegal Search or Seizure: If evidence was obtained without a valid warrant or probable cause, it may be inadmissible in court.
• Coerced Confession: If police used intimidation, threats, or deceptive tactics to obtain a confession, the defense can move to suppress the statement.
• Improper Lineups: If the defendant was identified through an unreliable or biased identification process, this evidence can be challenged.

---

Alibi Defense

An alibi defense demonstrates that the defendant could not have committed the crime because they were elsewhere when it occurred. Evidence supporting an alibi includes:

• Witness testimony.
• Receipts, GPS data, or phone records confirming the defendant’s location.
• Video footage showing the defendant at a different location during the time of the crime.

---

How Our Murder Defense Attorney Can Help

Los Angeles murder defense attorney Arash Hashemi, has a proven track record of successfully defending clients in high-stakes criminal cases, including murder and attempted murder. We understand the complexities of these charges and are committed to providing a rigorous and strategic defense to protect your rights and future.

Here’s how we can assist you in fighting premeditated murder charges in California:

Analyze the Evidence: Our team will meticulously review every detail of your case, including police reports, witness statements, forensic evidence, and any available surveillance footage, to uncover weaknesses in the prosecution’s case. By identifying inconsistencies or gaps in their evidence, we can build a strong defense on your behalf.

Challenge the Allegations: Whether it’s disputing claims of premeditation, showing a lack of intent, or exposing unreliable witness testimony, we will aggressively challenge the prosecution’s case. Our goal is to weaken their arguments at every step, ensuring that your side of the story is heard.

Explore Lesser Charges: In some cases, premeditated murder charges may not align with the evidence. Our firm has successfully negotiated to have charges reduced to second-degree murder or manslaughter, which carry significantly lighter penalties.

Build a Customized Defense Strategy: Every case is unique, and we know that a one-size-fits-all approach won’t work. Whether your defense involves self-defense, heat of passion, or mistaken identity, we will craft a personalized strategy that addresses the specific facts of your case.

Proven Results in High-Stakes Cases

• Attempted Murder Charges Dismissed: In one notable case, Attorney Arash Hashemi successfully had attempted murder charges dismissed, sparing the client from life-altering penalties.
• Murder Charge Reduced and Sentence Significantly Lowered: In another case, our client faced a severe murder charge, but with a strong defense strategy, we negotiated a reduction in charges and a significantly reduced sentence.

Aggressive Trial Representation

When your case proceeds to trial, you need an experienced litigator who will fight tirelessly on your behalf. Arash Hashemi has extensive experience in the courtroom, presenting compelling defenses to juries and working to secure the best possible outcome for his clients.

---