---

What Does It Mean to Have a Criminal Case Dismissed?

When a criminal case is dismissed, the charges against the defendant are dropped, and the case does not proceed to trial. This spares the defendant from potential penalties, including jail time, fines, and the lasting impact of a criminal record. In Los Angeles, dismissals can occur in one of two ways. A dismissal “with prejudice” permanently prevents the prosecution from refiling the case, ensuring the matter is fully resolved. Alternatively, a dismissal “without prejudice” allows prosecutors to refile charges if new evidence emerges. Achieving a dismissal is vital for protecting a defendant’s future, as it clears their name and shields them from the personal and professional repercussions of a conviction.

---

Reasons a Criminal Case May Be Dismissed in California

Lack of Evidence

For a criminal case to proceed, the prosecution must establish sufficient evidence to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. If the evidence is weak, inconsistent, or incomplete, the defense can argue for dismissal. Common examples include:

• Weak or Inconsistent Witness Testimony: Witness accounts that are contradictory, unreliable, or influenced by external factors (e.g., coercion or bias) can weaken the prosecution’s case.
  Example: A key witness changes their statement multiple times, casting doubt on their credibility.
• Insufficient Physical Evidence: Cases often rely on tangible evidence, such as forensic results, video recordings, or physical objects linking the defendant to the crime. When such evidence is missing or inconclusive, it creates reasonable doubt.
  Example: No fingerprints, DNA, or surveillance footage ties the defendant to the alleged crime scene.

Procedural Violations

Procedural errors by law enforcement or the prosecution can undermine the legitimacy of a case. California law requires strict adherence to procedural rules to ensure fairness. Key violations include:

• Statute of Limitations Violations: Criminal charges must be filed within a legally specified timeframe. If the prosecution files charges after the statute of limitations expires, the case can be dismissed.
  Example: For most misdemeanors, charges must be filed within one year of the alleged offense.
• Improper Service of Court Documents: The defendant must be properly notified of charges and court proceedings. Failure to serve documents in accordance with California law can render the case invalid.
  Example: A defendant is not informed of their arraignment due to improper notification, violating their right to a fair process.

Constitutional Violations

The U.S. Constitution guarantees certain protections to individuals accused of crimes. Violations of these rights can lead to the exclusion of evidence or dismissal of the entire case. Examples include:

• Unlawful Arrests: Arrests made without probable cause violate the Fourth Amendment. Evidence obtained from an unlawful arrest may be inadmissible in court.
  Example: A police officer arrests a suspect based solely on a hunch, without credible evidence or a warrant.
• Miranda Violations: Under Miranda v. Arizona, law enforcement must inform defendants of their right to remain silent and to have an attorney present during questioning. Failure to do so can render statements inadmissible.
  Example: A suspect confesses to a crime during interrogation but was not informed of their Miranda rights.

Police Misconduct

Unethical actions by law enforcement can severely compromise a case. Examples of police misconduct include:

• Falsifying Evidence: Altering or fabricating evidence undermines the integrity of the investigation and violates the defendant’s rights.
  Example: An officer plants illegal drugs on a suspect during a search.
• Illegal Searches and Seizures: Evidence obtained without a valid search warrant or outside the scope of probable cause is inadmissible under the Fourth Amendment.
  Example: Police search a suspect’s home without a warrant or consent and seize incriminating items.
• Entrapment: Law enforcement cannot induce a person to commit a crime they would not have otherwise committed.
  Example: An undercover officer pressures a reluctant individual into selling drugs.

Prosecutorial Misconduct

Prosecutors are required to follow ethical guidelines and present cases based on evidence. Misconduct can include:

• Withholding Exculpatory Evidence: The prosecution must disclose evidence that could prove the defendant’s innocence (as required by Brady v. Maryland). Failure to do so can result in dismissal.
  Example: The prosecution possesses DNA evidence that excludes the defendant as the perpetrator but fails to share it with the defense.
• Filing Charges Without Sufficient Justification: Cases must be supported by probable cause. Filing baseless charges to pressure a plea deal violates due process.
  Example: A prosecutor files multiple serious charges based on minimal evidence, hoping to intimidate the defendant into accepting a plea bargain.

Defense attorneys can file motions to dismiss or sanctions against the prosecution for ethical violations, potentially resulting in case dismissal or reduced charges. Each of these reasons represents an opportunity for a skilled defense attorney to challenge the prosecution’s case. By identifying and leveraging weaknesses, procedural errors, or misconduct, defendants can significantly improve their chances of achieving a dismissal and protecting their future.

---

Legal Strategies to Dismiss a Criminal Case in California

Filing a Motion to Dismiss

Under Penal Code Section 995 in Los Angeles, defendants can file a motion to dismiss if the evidence presented during the preliminary hearing is insufficient or if procedural errors occurred. This motion is a powerful defense tool to prevent a case from proceeding to trial when the legal basis for the charges is weak or flawed. A common reason for filing a 995 motion is insufficient evidence. The defense can argue that the evidence presented at the preliminary hearing fails to establish probable cause for the charges. For instance, Attorney Arash Hashemi successfully used this strategy in an attempted murder case, demonstrating that the evidence was inadequate to support the charges. The court agreed, leading to the dismissal of the case.

Procedural or constitutional errors during the preliminary hearing also serve as grounds for a 995 motion. For example, if a judge admits hearsay evidence that unfairly influences the hearing’s outcome, the defense can challenge the error through this motion. Filing a motion to dismiss under Penal Code Section 995 ensures that defendants are not unfairly subjected to trial when significant legal flaws exist in the prosecution’s case.

Challenging Evidence

Defense attorneys often challenge evidence obtained unlawfully by filing motions to suppress under the Fourth Amendment or other legal protections. If the prosecution’s case relies heavily on evidence acquired through improper methods, excluding that evidence can significantly weaken their position, often resulting in a dismissal. Unlawful searches or seizures are a common basis for suppression. For instance, if police conduct a vehicle search without a valid warrant, probable cause, or the driver’s consent, any contraband found may be excluded from the case. Attorney Arash Hashemi successfully demonstrated this in a recent case where the court ruled the search unconstitutional. With the critical evidence removed, the charges were dismissed.

Coerced confessions or violations of Miranda rights also present strong grounds for challenging evidence. If a defendant confesses under duress or without being properly informed of their right to remain silent and have an attorney present, such statements can be excluded. In one case, after hours of aggressive interrogation without Miranda warnings, a defendant’s confession was deemed inadmissible. This critical exclusion led to the case’s dismissal, as the prosecution could no longer prove its claims. By challenging improperly obtained evidence, skilled defense attorneys ensure that constitutional rights are upheld and defendants receive fair treatment under the law.

Negotiating with Prosecutors

Negotiating with prosecutors is a vital strategy employed by criminal defense attorneys in Los Angeles to reduce or dismiss charges before trial. This collaborative approach often relies on presenting mitigating circumstances, highlighting the defendant’s lack of criminal history, or offering alternative resolutions that align with the interests of justice.

One effective tactic involves diversion agreements, particularly for first-time offenders. For instance, in a DUI case, Attorney Arash Hashemi successfully negotiated for a client to complete an alcohol education program and community service. Upon fulfilling these requirements, the charges were dismissed, sparing the client from a criminal conviction and its long-term consequences.

Restitution agreements are another powerful tool in non-violent cases where financial harm is at issue. By arranging for the defendant to compensate the victim, the prosecution may agree to dismiss or significantly reduce the charges. This approach not only resolves the matter efficiently but also demonstrates the defendant’s willingness to take responsibility, which courts and prosecutors often view favorably. Prosecutorial negotiations require both legal expertise and a deep understanding of the nuances of criminal law, making experienced representation essential to achieving the best possible outcome.

Pretrial Diversion Programs

Pretrial diversion programs offer eligible defendants an opportunity to avoid prosecution by focusing on rehabilitation rather than punishment. These programs are designed to address the underlying issues contributing to criminal behavior, such as substance abuse or lack of judgment, and can lead to case dismissal upon successful completion. For individuals facing drug-related charges, diversion programs often involve court-supervised treatment or counseling. For instance, a client charged with possession of a controlled substance might enroll in a state-approved drug treatment program. After completing the program, the charges are dismissed, enabling the individual to move forward without a criminal record.

First-time misdemeanor offenders also frequently qualify for pretrial diversion. These programs allow individuals with no prior convictions to participate in rehabilitative efforts, such as community service or educational courses, as an alternative to traditional prosecution. By fulfilling these requirements, defendants can achieve a dismissal, avoiding the long-term impact of a criminal conviction. Pretrial diversion is an invaluable legal option for eligible defendants, helping to mitigate the consequences of criminal charges while fostering personal growth and accountability.

Proving No Intent or Lack of Mens Rea

Proving the absence of intent, or “mens rea,” is a critical strategy in challenging criminal charges. Many criminal offenses require the prosecution to establish that the defendant knowingly or intentionally engaged in unlawful conduct. If the defense can demonstrate that the defendant lacked intent, the foundation of the prosecution’s case can crumble.

In cases involving accidental actions, the defense might argue that the alleged conduct was not deliberate. For example, a defendant accused of theft could present evidence showing that they genuinely believed the item they took was their own property. This lack of criminal intent can lead to a dismissal of charges.

Similarly, misunderstandings or innocent mistakes can often explain conduct that might otherwise appear suspicious. For instance, a shoplifting charge might be dropped after the defense proves the defendant absentmindedly left a store with unpaid merchandise while distracted, without any intention to steal. By highlighting the absence of criminal intent, skilled attorneys can undermine the prosecution’s case, increasing the likelihood of a dismissal or reduction of charges.

---

Case Examples: Successful Criminal Case Dismissals

Attempted Murder Charges Dismissed

Court: Superior Court of California, Los Angeles (Case SA104*)
Charge: Attempted murder under Penal Code 664/187(A)

Case Overview:
Our client faced life-altering consequences after being charged with attempted murder. The allegations stemmed from an altercation where the client claimed self-defense. Despite raising the issue during the preliminary hearing, the prosecution argued that the force used was disproportionate and warranted an attempted murder charge. Attorney Hashemi meticulously reviewed the evidence, including witness testimony and forensic reports. He filed a Penal Code 995 motion, challenging the prosecution’s evidence and arguing that the self-defense claim was valid. During extensive oral arguments, Attorney Hashemi highlighted inconsistencies in the prosecution’s case and emphasized the lack of evidence supporting intent to kill. The court agreed with the defense, ruling that the evidence did not justify holding the client to answer for attempted murder. All charges were dismissed, clearing the client of wrongdoing and avoiding a lengthy prison sentence.

Robbery and Assault Charges Dismissed

Court: Superior Court of California, Riverside (Case RIF2104*)
Charges: Robbery, assault with a firearm, and extortion under Penal Codes 211, 245(a), and 524

Case Overview:
Our client was accused of multiple serious offenses, including robbery, assault with a firearm, and extortion. The potential sentence exceeded 15 years in state prison. The charges arose from a confrontation during which the client claimed they acted in self-defense. Attorney Hashemi conducted a thorough year-long investigation, gathering evidence to corroborate the self-defense claim. This included obtaining witness statements, surveillance footage, and expert testimony regarding the circumstances of the incident. He also demonstrated that the prosecution’s narrative relied on weak and contradictory evidence. After reviewing the defense’s findings, the District Attorney’s Office dismissed all charges. The client was completely exonerated, avoiding the severe penalties associated with a conviction.

Felony Battery Charge Dismissed

Court: Superior Court of California, Los Angeles (Case BA336*)
Charge: Felony battery with serious bodily injury under Penal Code 243(d)

Case Overview:
The client was charged with felony battery following an incident that resulted in serious bodily injury. If convicted, the client faced a potential sentence of up to four years in state prison. The defense argued that the client acted in defense of another during a heated altercation. During the preliminary hearing, Attorney Hashemi presented evidence supporting the defense of another claim. He introduced eyewitness testimony and physical evidence showing that the client’s actions were both reasonable and necessary to protect another person from imminent harm. The court ruled in favor of the defense, dismissing the felony battery charge entirely. The client avoided a prison sentence and was cleared of all allegations.

---

Common Scenarios Where Cases Are Dismissed

Criminal cases can be dismissed for a variety of reasons, depending on the charges and the specific details of the case. Traffic infractions, for example, are often dismissed due to administrative errors. These might include tickets issued with incorrect information, improperly filed citations, or insufficient evidence to support the violation. These cases usually hinge on procedural issues, and dismissals can occur when the prosecution fails to meet basic legal requirements. Misdemeanor offenses, such as petty theft or minor drug possession, are often eligible for dismissal under specific conditions. First-time offenders may be offered the chance to participate in pretrial diversion programs, which focus on rehabilitation instead of punishment. Successful completion of these programs—such as attending treatment sessions or completing community service—can result in the charges being dropped. Additionally, a misdemeanor case might be dismissed if key evidence is unavailable or if witness statements are unreliable, leaving the prosecution unable to move forward.

For felony cases, dismissals are less common but can occur under specific circumstances. These cases usually require the defense to identify major procedural or constitutional violations. For example, charges might be dismissed if evidence was obtained through an unlawful search or if the defendant was arrested without probable cause. Serious legal errors, such as violations of a defendant’s Miranda rights, can also lead to dismissal. In more complex cases, including those involving violent felonies, strategic legal advocacy can uncover weaknesses in the prosecution’s evidence, creating opportunities to have charges dismissed before trial.

---

Why You Need a Skilled Criminal Defense Attorney

A skilled attorney knows how to thoroughly analyze the evidence presented by the prosecution, identifying weaknesses that can be exploited to your advantage. This includes:

• Exposing inconsistencies or inaccuracies in witness testimony.
• Challenging the admissibility of evidence obtained through illegal searches or procedural violations.
• Highlighting gaps in the prosecution’s ability to prove intent or causation beyond a reasonable doubt.

Achieving Dismissals Through Strategic Motions

An experienced defense attorney doesn’t wait for trial but takes proactive measures to resolve cases early. This includes filing strategic motions to suppress unlawfully obtained evidence, disputing probable cause, and leveraging California Penal Code Section 995 to challenge the sufficiency of the prosecution’s case. These legal tools can often lead to a case dismissal before it ever reaches trial.

Preventing Refiled Charges

One of the critical advantages of skilled legal representation is ensuring that a dismissal is final. An experienced attorney will fight for a dismissal “with prejudice,” meaning the prosecution cannot refile the same charges. This provides peace of mind and certainty that the matter is fully resolved.

With over 20 years of experience in criminal defense, Attorney Hashemi has a proven record of securing dismissals for clients facing a range of charges, from robbery to attempted murder. His meticulous approach to building defenses, combined with his deep understanding of California’s criminal justice system, ensures that clients receive the strongest possible representation.

---